Current:Home > NewsRedistricting redux: North Carolina lawmakers to draw again new maps for Congress and themselves -WealthTrail Solutions
Redistricting redux: North Carolina lawmakers to draw again new maps for Congress and themselves
View
Date:2025-04-24 23:51:59
RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — With a new state budget completed, North Carolina legislators now turn their attention yet again to mapping the state’s congressional and General Assembly districts.
The House and Senate redistricting committees scheduled hearings this week — the last one happening Wednesday in Raleigh — to receive public comment about the process of drawing district boundaries that would be used in the 2024 elections and for the remainder of the decade.
Redistricting in North Carolina seems to be endless. Since 2011, six different versions of maps for the state’s congressional delegation, the state House and state Senate have been enacted by courts or lawmakers, although not all were used in elections.
Now another set should be voted on in October, with the Republicans who draw them seeking to retain or squeeze out more seats for their side on Capitol Hill and at the Legislative Building.
WHY ARE MAPS BEING DRAWN AGAIN?
Because state Supreme Court justices and the law said so.
Each redistricting cycle begins the year after each census. The GOP-controlled General Assembly drew congressional and legislative maps in fall 2021 based on the 2020 population data.
In February 2022, the state Supreme Court — with a Democratic majority at the time — struck down all three maps, declared the state constitution outlawed extensive partisan gerrymandering and ordered new boundaries. Ultimately, the legislature’s second edition of General Assembly maps and an interim congressional plan drawn by trial judges were used in the 2022 elections.
But the Supreme Court flipped to a Republican majority, and in April the GOP justices reversed previous rulings and declared there was no constitutional prohibition on partisan gerrymandering.
State law already said that any court-drawn plan — like the 2022 congressional map — could only be used for one election cycle, setting up a redraw for 2024. And the justices also ruled in April that since the 2021 maps were never truly “established,” lawmakers could rework General Assembly seat boundaries, too.
WHEN WILL THE MAPS GET APPROVED?
Senate leader Phil Berger told reporters he hoped votes on a congressional map would occur the week of Oct. 9, with votes on General Assembly lines later in the month.
Republicans hold comfortable seat majorities in both the House and Senate, so whatever lines are supported by the overwhelming number of them will be enacted. Redistricting legislation isn’t subject to Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper’s veto stamp.
WHO WILL GET THE UPPER HAND?
Republicans certainly will aim to draw lines that pick up more U.S. House seats and seek to secure their veto-proof majorities in the General Assembly for years to come.
Under the U.S. House map used in 2022, Democrats and Republicans each won seven seats. Political experts have said f our current Democratic incumbents are vulnerable to having their current districts altered so that Republican chances to unseat them improve.
A congressional map approved by Republicans in 2021, but which never got implemented, would have given the GOP a strong chance to win 10 of the delegation’s 14 seats.
ARE OTHER LIMITS PLACED ON THE MAPS?
A mosaic of state and federal court rulings, constitutions and the U.S. Voting Rights Act speak to criteria that mapmakers will follow.
For example, legislators must ensure that districts within the same statewide map are equal in population or close to it. Criteria in previous remapping also have aimed to keep districts compact and considered where current lawmakers live.
And General Assembly boundaries must comply with a requirement to minimize the number of districts that cross county lines. But the county groupings that result also must give way to Voting Rights Act requirements to ensure Black voters aren’t in a worse position to elect favored candidates.
WILL LAWSUITS CHALLENGING THE NEW MAPS BE FILED?
Almost assuredly, as it has for every round of North Carolina remapping since the 1980s.
Litigation will have to begin quickly if critics want to prevent the use of maps starting with the March 5 primary elections. Candidate filing for 2024 begins Dec. 4.
North Carolina and U.S. supreme court decisions short-circuiting most partisan gerrymandering claims narrow the types of litigation likely to be successful. Accusations of racial gerrymandering and violations of other mapmaking criteria remain possible avenues in state or federal court.
Lawsuits may be the only way that citizens can gain more information about why lawmakers drew boundaries beyond their public talking points. Changes to public record rules in the state budget repeal a law that gave the public access to legislative records and communications related to redistricting as soon as maps were adopted.
veryGood! (43526)
Related
- Civic engagement nonprofits say democracy needs support in between big elections. Do funders agree?
- 'Tiger King' director uncages new 'Chimp Crazy' docuseries that is truly bananas
- A studio helps artists with developmental disabilities find their voice. It was almost shuttered.
- Amid Matthew Perry arrests, should doctors be blamed for overdose deaths?
- Hidden Home Gems From Kohl's That Will Give Your Space a Stylish Refresh for Less
- Why does my cat keep throwing up? Advice from an expert.
- 19 Kids and Counting's Jana Duggar Marries Stephen Wissmann in Arkansas Wedding
- Matthew Perry Ketamine Case: Doctors Called Him “Moron” in Text Messages, Prosecutors Allege
- US wholesale inflation accelerated in November in sign that some price pressures remain elevated
- Alaska State Troopers beat, stunned and used dog in violent arrest of wrong man, charges say
Ranking
- The Daily Money: Disney+ wants your dollars
- These tiny worms live in eyes, feed on tears and could transmit to humans
- As Sonya Massey's death mourned, another tragedy echoes in Springfield
- Disney wrongful death lawsuit over allergy highlights danger of fine print
- From family road trips to travel woes: Americans are navigating skyrocketing holiday costs
- 'Ketamine Queen,' doctors, director: A look at the 5 charged in Matthew Perry's death
- Prominent 2020 election denier seeks GOP nod for Michigan Supreme Court race
- How Lubbock artists pushed back after the city ended funding for its popular art walk
Recommendation
Southern California rocked by series of earthquakes: Is a bigger one brewing?
BeatKing, Houston Rapper Also Known as Club Godzilla, Dead at 39
Rail bridge collapses on US-Canada border
Looking to buy a home? You may now need to factor in the cost of your agent’s commission
Plunge Into These Olympic Artistic Swimmers’ Hair and Makeup Secrets
Former NASCAR champion Kurt Busch arrested for DWI, reckless driving in North Carolina
Federal court strikes down Missouri investment rule targeted at `woke politics’
Why Fans Think Taylor Swift Made Cheeky Nod to Travis Kelce Anniversary During Eras Tour With Ed Sheeran